Vibe Code Cleanup and Hardening
If Claude Helped You Build It — But You’re Not Sure It’s Safe To Ship
I help founder-led teams stabilize AI-accelerated codebases so they can ship with confidence again.
Former Senior Software Engineer at Microsoft.
Founder of Relational Artificial Intelligence Networks (RAIN).
If this sounds familiar, I can help:
“I think it works… but I don’t fully understand it.”
“Claude keeps fixing things but new stuff keeps breaking.”
“I’m scared to touch production settings.”
“I don’t know what I don’t know.”
What changes after an engagement
You know exactly what’s risky — and what isn’t.
You stop guessing about production settings.
You have a prioritized fix plan, not vibes.
You ship with guardrails instead of hope.
Engagement options
1) Ship-Safe Diagnostic (3–5 Days)
Best for:
Solo founders about to launch.
Anyone who thinks “Claude fixed it” is enough.
Timeline:
3 to 5 business days.
Deliverables:
Full architecture risk map
Async code review + written report
Secret handling + exposure audit
CI/CD and deployment vulnerability review
Prioritized remediation plan
Includes explicit “Safe to Ship” verdict
Optional 60-minute debrief call
2) Production Hardening Sprint (2–4 Weeks)
Best for:
Founders who passed the Diagnostic but cannot safely launch yet.
Goal:
Stabilize critical paths so your app survives real users.
Focus areas (based on Diagnostic findings):
Critical-path test upgrades
Secret handling corrections
CI/CD hardening
Deployment rollback safety
Production config review
Observability + logging baseline
Outcome:
You stop guessing.
You can deploy without fear.
You have guardrails in place.
You know what would break — before it breaks.
3) Full Refactor Program
Best for:
Founders whose architecture drift is blocking scale or stability.
Goal:
Restructure your system so it can grow without collapsing.
Scope may include:
Boundary-first architectural redesign
Module separation + responsibility mapping
Expanded test strategy
CI/CD rebuild if needed
Operational runbooks
Team handoff documentation
Executed against Diagnostic findings
Outcome:
Your architecture becomes intentional.
You can onboard developers.
You stop fighting your own codebase.
You scale without accumulating chaos.
Most founders start with the Ship-Safe Diagnostic.
The Sprint or Refactor is recommended only if risk levels justify it.
How I work
20-minute diagnostic call
Fit or no-fit recommendation
Scoped proposal with timeline and acceptance criteria
Weekly execution checkpoints
Start here
Send your stack, biggest blocker, and 30-day target
I will reply with fit or no-fit and the exact next step
Fixed-scope start · fit/no-fit · no pressure
